US Senator Elizabeth Warren popularized the 50/20/30 budget rule in her book “All Your Worth: The Ultimate Lifetime Money Plan.” The basic rule is to divide after-tax income, spending 50% on needs and 30% on wants while allocating 20% to savings.
Thereafter, experts have been recommending consumers to save 10-20% of their income. Even in Singapore.
But I have a different opinion on this and won’t recommend people of all ages to only save 10-20% of their income.
Here’s my view.
For someone who is starting their first job, the 50/30/20 budget rule may be a good start since the salary isn’t very high.
According to Straits Times, the median monthly salary of fresh graduates is around $3,400. Let’s break the salary up using the 50/30/20 budget rule as a benchmark. With $2,720 after CPF contribution, that means as a fresh graduate, you should be spending up to $1,360 on needs, $816 on wants and $544 on savings.
I think that’s a fair starting point, if expenses such as insurance is considered part of needs.
Let’s fast forward to 3 years later.
You worked hard, possibly switched to a higher paying job. Your salary went up by 10% (I’m being pragmatic) and you’re getting $3,740 per month now.
That splits your salary into $1,496 on needs, $897.60 on wants and $598.40 using the 50/30/20 rule, after CPF contribution.
By following the budget rule, you would be spending an additional $217.60, bumping your total expenses to $2,393.60.
But what if your lifestyle hasn’t changed much? Are you going to spend more money just because the budget rule allows it?
If you received a salary increase and your lifestyle has not changed, there’s no reason to be spending more money. I know it’s enticing to eat in fancy restaurants more often, but does it really bring you joy and value?
The prudent and logical thing to do with that extra stash of money is to channel it into savings.
Now that we agree on this, your budget now becomes $1,360 (unchanged) on needs, $816 (unchanged) on wants and $816 (+$272) on savings.
We’ve jumped off the 50/30/20 budget rule bandwagon.
Your needs/wants/savings proportion is now 46/27/27 and this budget works for you!
Let’s go even further. You’re 30 with around 10 years of work experience under your belt.
You’re making $100,000 per year now. That’s $6,666 per month after CPF contribution.
Your needs have slightly increased to $1,500. You have a girlfriend and you’re spending a bit more bringing her to nice places, spending quality time. So wants have ballooned to $1,500. You save the rest.
The increases are real, but in reality your needs/wants/savings proportion have improved significantly to 22/22/56.
Considering all things, I think 56% is a very decent saving rate.
In the long run, needs-based expenses will eventually plateau while wants expenses have to be managed. But all things considered, it won’t be surprising for savings to hover around 70-80% eventually.
When you start your financial planning journey, your needs/wants/saving budget rule has to be suited to your current income. The 50/30/20 rule is not necessarily relevant and should not be even be a benchmark (unless you are starting your first job).
How did you plan your first budget? Let me know in the comments below.
For new readers, I bought a SOHO property at The Bridge, Cambodia and I saved diligently each month in order to pay for the purchase.
After making my final payment for my SOHO apartment, I signed the tenancy lease agreement to officially allow the property developer manage the leasing of my apartment for the next 3 years. In the clause, included a free 3-month rental period for the property developer to renovate and secure a tenant for my apartment.
Last week, I finally received my first quarterly rental payment from the property developer. Woohoo!
Here’s the breakdown of the charges involved in this rental property:
After deducting the above charges, my quarterly rental works out to $1187.
That works out to around 4.42% rental yield for this property.
That’s pretty average but given that my focus for this investment is on the potential capital appreciation, let’s see what happens in the next few years.
Do you really understand why you need insurance?
I don’t want to say that all insurance agents are unscrupulous and money-minded, because I have a few friends who work as insurance agents and are really good at their job.
The sad reality is that insurers are dishing out very attractive commissions for insurance products that are designed to make you part with more money than what you have to. They make their products more complicated by integrating elements of investment to charge a higher premium and grow their corporate revenue.
For a insurance agent who’s basically an insurer’s sales person, it’s very hard to not focus on selling the more profitable products.
You have to look out for yourself because nobody is doing it for you.
Opposed to what many insurance agents are telling you, insurance is actually all about mitigating risk.
You just bought your home and did a nice renovation. Losing your home and belongings to fire or theft could mean losing everything. In order to mitigate that risk, you buy a home insurance to reimburse you for your losses.
That in my opinion, is what insurance is truly meant to do.
Start by determining the probability and impact of your risk.
TL;DR? Here’s a risk matrix to help you understand risk management in a nutshell.
If a risk has a high impact to your life and a high probability of occurring, the best way to eliminate this risk is to not participate in the particular activity or own the particular property.
The high impact could cost you everything you worked for (or your life) and the high probability of occurring means that insurers will charge you an arm and a leg just to protect you from the risk.
Obviously we can’t avoid all forms of risks or we’ll never leave our home or cross the street. If the impact of the risk is not devastating, we can try to manage the risk by reducing the chance of it happening.
In most cases, reducing risk is just a matter of using common sense and doing things you know you should have done.
If you can reduce the chance of a risk occurring, you may opt not to get any insurance to protect yourself against it.
There are some risks that have a low probability of occurring and low impact on your life should they occur. For these risks do you even need insurance coverage?
In some cases, the answer could be no.
Here’s an example.
You buy a standing fan from Courts for $39 and the cashier tries to sell you their in-house warranty that offers a longer and more comprehensive coverage for $10 (this is a fictitious amount). Personally, I would be willing to accept the risk of the fan breaking down and will either pay out of my own pocket for the repairs or purchase a new standing fan when that happens.
The amount of risks you are willing to accept depends largely on your risk appetite.
For me, I don’t always buy travel insurance for short holiday trips because I am willing to accept the risks involved. You may not want to accept these risks.
For risks that do not have a high probability of occurring but can make a large impact to your life when that happens, you would want to consider transferring these risks from you to another party.
Buying insurance is the most common method of risk transfer.
Insurance allows you to pay a predetermined fee (premium) and in return, the insurer takes over the risks from you. Should the risk occur, the insurer will absorb the losses that you would otherwise have to pay out of pocket.
Insurance makes the most sense when the impact of the risk is large but the cost to transfer the risk is low in perspective.
Here are a few examples:
You now understand what risk management is all about.
It’s time for you to decide what are the personal risks that you are undertaking today and how you should manage them.
If the insurance product that you are considering to purchase does not transfer away an adequate amount of personal risk for a low cost, then you don’t really need them.
If your insurance agent is talking to you about project returns and profits for purchasing an insurance product, instead of how the product can protect you from certain personal risks, walk away.
Do you agree with my view in this article? I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comment section below.