Before you read further, this article is not sponsored and the reason why I am using NTUC Income’s VivoCash Prime insurance plan as a reference in this article is simply because it’s way too easy generate an online quotation with relevant benefits illustrations through their online life insurance platform without going through an insurance agent. The sweetener in buying online is that if I choose to buy online, they offer an extended free-look period of 90 days (just in case I get buyer’s remorse later on).
It’s interesting to know that if you’re considering to purchase a life insurance product these days, there are so many different ways to do that.
If you’re allergic to insurance agents like me (okay, there are a few trusted insurance agents that I still consult), you can now choose to buy your life insurance online. Woohoo!
When planning for my retirement, I focus on 2 things.
There’s only that much I can do to reduce my fixed expenses so my alternative was to find additional income streams that provide guaranteed income that can pay for these fixed expenses for the rest of my life.
By doing this, I avoid paying for these fixed expense with my retirement portfolio.
Long time readers would know that I’m in favour of buying term insurance and investing the rest on your own. That’s why I’m using robo advisors like AutoWealth to invest my money. My mindset remains unchanged.
The reason why I’m evaluating NTUC Income’s VivoCash Prime is because its coverage is up to 100 years old. That also means it will provide me with annual cash payouts till the age of 100. At the age of 100, the policy will mature and return me all the premiums paid and around 22% returns.
For your information, I always plan my retirement up to the age of 100.
VivoCash Prime also ticks the box for someone like me who has commitment issues. Hell, I don’t even re-contract my mobile and internet subscription.
Since I was able to save and pay for my overseas property in Cambodia in cold hard cash within 3 years, I think I’ll be comfortable with minimum 5-year premium term offered in VivoCash Prime.
Remember that I’m still investing a larger percentage of my monthly savings through various investment channels and I am not reducing my monthly investment budget. This investment strategy to build a decent retirement portfolio will not change.
A recent salary increment allowed me to save an additional $5,000 per year so I’m considering to use this additional money for VivoCash Prime.
I generated an online quotation for VivoCash Prime using NTUC Income’s online life insurance platform with my intended budget of $5,000 for 5 years as the premium terms.
Here are the results.
By paying a total of $25,000 annually for 5 years, I will receive a guaranteed cash payout of $525 each year up till the age of 100. I’m ignoring the non-guaranteed cash payout of $213 at investment of 3.25%, treating that as icing on the cake if I do receive that non-guaranteed payout.
With my retirement expenses projected to be around $40,000 each year, $525 doesn’t look like much in the grand scheme of things. It works out to be $43.75 per month, which is enough to pay for my monthly mobile subscription.
I’m 36 this year and we’re talking about 59 years of mobile subscription fees if I survive to become a centurian, netting $30,975 in total payouts. At any point in time if I were to die, I’ll get all my money back because a guaranteed amount of $28,027 will be paid out as death benefit. That’s around of 112% of the $25,000 total premiums paid.
I know it can sound crazy to put $25,000 into something as frivolous as a free mobile subscription for life. But what if we 10X this? If I set $250,000 aside to receive $5,250 each year, what can that pay for?
In my case, $5,250 could easily pay for the yearly premiums of my health insurance for the rest of my life. What do you think about having free health insurance for the rest of your life, not having to worry about hospitalisation bills, ever?
If you don’t already have an investment strategy to build up your retirement portfolio, you shouldn’t be considering purchasing insurance policies with the objective of income generation to pay for expenses. Your money could be better spent on accumulating capital gains through more aggressive investments.
In my case, I’m already doing many things to build my retirement portfolio.
Considering all the activities above, I feel that budgeting $5,000 per year for VivoCash Prime is only a small portion of everything I’m doing for retirement planning.
You won’t trust Mickey Mouse to manage your portfolio so there’s no reason to trust Mickey J to make insurance decisions for you either. The contents in this article should be considered as entertainment until you do your own due diligence by spending time researching and getting advice about insurance products and make your own informed insurance decisions.
NTUC Income just launched a viral marketing video that complements their recent study on the Sandwich Generation and how Singaporeans view their financial future.
I know it’s becoming viral because my friends who aren’t great at financial planning started posting the video in Facebook.
In case you’ve not watched it before, here’s the video.
Warning: Have your tissue box nearby before you click the ‘play’ button.
Essentially, the Sandwich Generation is defined as parents who are tasked with supporting their own children, as well as their parents at the same time.
In Singapore, our Asian values means that we are often dependents of our parents when they are no longer working. Some continue working out of necessity because their kids aren’t able to support them.
I’m not in the Sandwich Generation yet because I’m still single but I’m already supporting my mum’s retirement through monthly top-ups in her CPF Retirement Account and allowances.
Due to our family circumstances, I’m also the owner of the 3-room HDB flat that we are staying in and paying the monthly mortgage.
If I get married and have a kid, I’d get auto-enrolled into the Sandwich Generation. No questions asked. 🙂
For many of us, I would like to think that we are in a position where we can help our kids get out of the Sandwich Generation by taking care of our own retirement.
When your kids do not have to take care of your retirement, they will be free to focus on being the best version of themselves. Isn’t that truly what we want for our kids?
What if you’re already close to 60 years old and left with a very short financial runway to turn thing around?
I’m sorry because I’m no motivation speaker and I can’t make you jump across a fire pit, thinking that everything’s going to be alright and fill you with all that kool-aid.
The reality is that you’d probably still need your kids to take care of your financial needs. But you could manage your personal finance, reduce unnecessary expenses and channel savings into low-risk income investments. Perhaps you could self-fund at least 50% of your living expenses.
Here are some of the things I’m doing, to ensure my kid (if I ever have one) doesn’t join the Sandwich Generation.
Every little effort you make, will help ease the burden you have on your kids.
Because even if you may not be the last Sandwich Generation in your family, your decisions could give your kids a chance to be the last Sandwich Generation.
Last week, I received an email from a reader asking for my opinion if she should surrender her annuity and top up her CPF Retirement Account to get a higher monthly payout from CPF Life.
Grab a cup of coffee while you read this article because it’s going to be a long one.
Here’s how the email goes.
I have been following your blog for a while. I refer to your blog about the CPF Life and Private Annuity Plan.
I am 65 this year, self-employed. Yearly I top-up my RA for tax relief in addition to Voluntary Contribution to the 3 accounts (OA, SA, MA). A month ago, I decided to defer my CPF payout to age 70 to enjoy the interest rate. By 70 years old, I probably would chose to join the CPF Life Scheme for life-time payout.
5 years ago (year 2014), my friend, a NTUC Income agent convinced me to buy a private annuity from her. I bought one with cash of SGD 150,000, and deferred the payout to age 65. At that time, the content in the contract communicated to me that the interest on the premium was 2.5% and the bonus was 2%. So, over the years before payout, I would receive a bit of money from the interest and bonus, even though the distribution cost is at 2%, which I think is high and for doing nothing – no financial advice whatsoever needed from NTUC Income.
Recently, I asked for some numbers from NTUC Income. Actually, the rate of interest they pay was only 1.75% and the bonus ranging between 1 to 2% depending on their investment performance. I understand the interest rate should be guaranteed and bonus varies. I am not very happy about this reduced interest rate.
Currently, the attraction from CPF was the high interest rate at 4% as compared to all financial institutions and private insurance companies. Another 1% and an extra 1% based on the formula.
Last week, out of curiosity, I threw out a question to myself. Would it be better off for me to surrender the Annuity Life with NTUC Income and use the surrender value to top up my RA to the maximum cap allowed?
With my original premium of SGD 150,000, the surrender value now stands at SGD 163,834.66.
My RA at CPF is currently at SGD 115,000. If I top-up my RA with the surrender value from NTUC Income, this will bring my RA amount to about SGD 279,000.
My NTUC Income Annuity plan monthly payout is on SGD 668 which shall commence monthly payout in Feb 2020. For the same amount of surrender value of SGD 163,834, using the CPF Life estimator, the monthly payout with CPF Life at age 65 is between $841 to $890 (standard plan); and if I chose the monthly payout at 70 years old, the amount is higher at $1098 to $1184 (standard plan). Just by comparing the payout at age 65, the difference is $173 ( I am using the lower amount $841 in CPF Life to less the monthly payout of $668 from NTUC Income). $173 more is quite a bit of money to receive every month for a full-time retiree in the future.
Also, even the monthly payout commences at age 65 or age 70, CPF continues to pay the 4% on the premium until the age of 82, but the 4% is put to the Lifelong Pool to sustain the payout for life, and this amount is not reflected in the premium statement. Whereas, for NTUC Income the interest and bonus will stop as soon as the payout commences at age 65.
Based on the above reasoning, would it be wise for me pull out from NTUC Income private annuity? If I pull-out, I would want to top-up my RA with the surrender value from NTUC Income to enjoy a higher payout in CPF Life.
Actually, I have another small annuity of $56,000 with NTUC Income since 2009. After 10 years the surrender value now is $77,000. The monthly payout is $368 and shall pay me in June 2019.
I like to hear your comment.
Before I begin, I wanted to address a few points that M has done incorrectly.
This way M calculated how much additional CPF Life payout she would receive if she surrendered the annuity and moved that money into her CPF Retirement Account was incorrect.
She should use the total of $115,000 + $158,000 (I’ll explain why we don’t use the full annuity surrender value later) to calculate the surplus monthly payout instead of just the $163,834.66 (annuity surrender value) alone.
Here’s how the figures look like:
Like what M did earlier, we use the lowest amount to calculate the surplus monthly payout. The additional monthly payout M will get for putting the surrender value of her annuity in CPF Life becomes $745 (withdraw at age 65) and $963 (withdraw at age 70).
If we compare against the monthly payout of $668 from M’s annuity, the difference is actually $77 (withdraw at age 65) and $295 (withdraw at age 70) instead of M’s original calculation of $173 (withdraw at age 65).
When M reached the age of 55, her CPF Retirement Account would have been created and money would have been moved from her Special Account and Ordinary Account into her Retirement Account.
As M’s birthday falls before 1 July 2009, her Full Retirement Sum is $106,000.
The way to calculate the maximum amount M can top up into her Retirement Account is by subtracting M’s Full Retirement Sum with the Enhanced Retirement Sum (2019). The current Enhanced Retirement Sum is $264,000.
$264,000 – $106,000 = $158,000
While M’s annuity has a surrender value of $163,834, there will be an excess $5,834 that can’t go into her Retirement Account. M can make a Voluntary Contribution into her CPF accounts and let that money go into her Ordinary and Special Accounts (her Medisave Account is already maxed out) to continue growing her money.
By the way, I’ve clarified this with the CPF Board and they do not consider the interest earned in the Retirement Account in this calculation. So the extra $9,000 in M’s Retirement Account has been excluded.
Below is a list of pros and cons of having an annuity on top of CPF Life.
|Ability to surrender your plan to have access to emergency funds||Monthly payout is subjected to bonus declared by the insurer|
|A separate stream of retirement income for diversification||Monthly payout is usually not as high as CPF Life|
In M’s case, she will have access to $163,834 from her annuity as part emergency funds if anything bad happens. Naturally this figure will gradually shrink as the insurer makes monthly payouts to her.
Here are the pros and cons of surrendering your annuity and topping up your Retirement Account for CPF Life.
|Higher overall monthly payout for retirement income||CPF Life monies cannot be withdrawn|
|Steady monthly payout from CPF Life with minimum fluctuations|
Since M is willing to defer her CPF Life payout till 70, she’s looking at an additional CPF Life monthly payout of $295 which is make a substantial difference to a retiree.
It could easily pay for your monthly transport and/or utility bills easily. If basic living expenses are already covered, that $295 can even pay for a few nice meals in restaurants with family and friends each month.
I’m assuming that M healthy and will live till at least Singapore’s average life expectancy of 85.4 years. That’s at least 20 years of retirement life that she can look forward to.
Here’s how I think M can consider doing.
Option A: If M already has a reasonably large sum of money (say $200,000) set aside in risk-free investments like Singapore Savings Bonds, she can choose to surrender her annuity and to top up $158,000 into your CPF RA. she can also choose to surrender only partial of her annuity to top up her CPF Retirement Account. That will maximise the retirement income she will receive from CPF Life.
Option B: But if she doesn’t have any other emergency savings set aside and these annuity plans are basically her only liquid assets, then I’d suggest she keeps her annuity plans (she can choose to surrender the annuity plan with a lower value to top up her CPF Retirement Account and keep the other plan) so that she has some flexibility in her retirement lifestyle in exchange for a slightly lower monthly payout from CPF Life and her annuity plans.
In any case, M sounds like she’s a prudent person so I don’t think she can really go wrong with either options. It’s more about making an informed decision based on her circumstances.
By the way, M can enroll into CPF Life as early as 1 month before your 65th birthday. But what’s important to note is after choosing her CPF Life Plan (Basic, Standard or Escalating), she will only have a 30-days grace period to amend your choice of CPF Life Plan.